The High Court of Cassation and Justice has ruled that, in accordance with Art. 303, Code of Civil Procedure, the court of appeal should not consider the criticism of illegality, not a matter of public policy, made outside the statutory period of appeal, such as those developed by the findings that the parties submitted written closing after debate . The High Court held that, in this situation, you can not appeal for annulment raised by way of such an examination omission, as there we are not present in a omission , by mistake, for research grounds by the court of appeal, but in the presence of a legal obligation to appeal the court of appeal for not analyzing the reasons beyond the statutory period of appeal. (Decision no. 2930 of 2 May 2012 I delivered in Civil Appeal Division of the High Court of Cassation and Justice appeal seeking annulment)
>> The source: JURIDICE.ro