The High Court of Cassation and Justice ruled that the motion for revision founded on the provisions of Art. 465 Code of Criminal Procedure, filed by a person upon whom the European Court of Human Rights has not decided, and in the light of an absence of a judgment by means of which the European court would ascertain the violation of a right of the person who requested the revision, is inadmissible. The person whose right has been violated, to which the provisions of Art. 465 para. (2) letter a) Code of Criminal Procedure refers, is the person who had had the status of party in both the case against the Romanian State settled through the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, and the case settled through the final judgment of the national court. (Decision no. 3076 of the 2nd of December 2014, given by the Criminal Division of the High Court of Cassation and Justice, covering revision)
:: The Source: JURIDICE.ro
