HCCJ. The place where the omission is committed

The High Court of Cassation and Justice has ruled that, concerning the action covering the complaint against the minutes for contravention, that applies the sanction to the claimant society for not having accomplished the obligation stated in art. 13 let. m) of the Law for security and health at work no. 319/2006, this obligation implying the duty to file the documents and to offer the information requested by the work inspectors, the headquarter of the employer being the place where the omission deed is committed. Thus, the High Court has showed that the competent court to judge the case is that which has in its patch the headquarter of the claimant. (Decision no. 1998 of the 29th of April 2014 pronounced by the Section of Contentious Administrative Matters of the High Court of Cassation and Justice covering a negative conflict of competence).

:: The source: JURIDICE.ro

Alexandra DOBRIȘAN

Related posts