Conflict of interests

The High Court of Cassation and Justice has decided that the participation of a public servant at decisions which facilitates obtaining patrimonial advantages for an association whose president and charter member is the husband of the concerned public servant consist in a violation of the legal status regarding the conflicts of interests, in accordance with art. 70 and 72 of Law no. 161/2003 on some measures for the ensurance of transparency in the exercise of public dignities, public functions and in business environment, the prevention and punishment of corruption. In this situation, the plainitiff, who served as Secretary General of the Government, approved the rental by RA- APPS, on favorable terms, of a space  for the association where her husband had the qualities mentioned above, although such conduct  was forbidden according to Art. 72 of Law no. 161/2003 . (Decision no. 5036 of April 18, 2013 pronounced on appeal by the Department of Administrative and Fiscal High Court of Cassation and Justice for annulment of the assessment report executed by ANI)

:: The source: JURIDICE.ro

Violeta-Cristina SECELEANU

Related posts